MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412400011 · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000734

Diabetes mellitus in alcohol-associated liver disease: Prevalence and outcomes

2025· article· en· W4412400011 on OpenAlexaff
Ben A. Ward, Mark Theodoreson, Guruprasad P. Aithal, Michael Allison, Mayur Brahmania, Ewan Forrest, Hannes Hagström, Steven Masson, Anne McCune, Keval Naik, Neil Rajoriya, Ian Rowe, Richard Parker

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineHazard ratioLiver transplantationDiabetes mellitusLiver diseaseProportional hazards modelRetrospective cohort studyCohortAlcoholic liver diseaseGastroenterologyAdverse effectCohort studyLiver biopsySurgeryTransplantationBiopsyConfidence intervalEndocrinologyCirrhosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Alcohol associated liver disease (ALD) is a common condition that is a significant global cause of morbidity and mortality. Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of adverse outcomes in other types of steatotic liver disease. This retrospective study sought to explore the relationship between ALD and DM. METHODS: The Worldwide Alcohol-related Liver Disease Outcomes (WALDO) study is an international multicenter cohort of patients with biopsy-proven ALD. The presence of DM at baseline or during follow-up was noted. Clinical events after index biopsy were noted, including death and liver-associated clinical events (LACE). Risks for adverse outcomes were assessed with Cox proportional hazard models with DM as a time-dependent variable to reflect periods of time without or with diabetes. All analyses were done in R. RESULTS: In total, 712 patients with a median age of 52 years were followed up for a median of 4.8 years (IQR: 1.2-9.5). At baseline, DM was present in 113 patients (15.9%), and a further 56 patients (7.8%) developed DM in follow-up. During follow-up, 113 patients developed LACE. One hundred fifty-two patients died from liver disease, and 46 underwent liver transplantation. DM was significantly associated with liver-related mortality (HR: 1.77, 1.15-2.73, p=0.009) and incident LACE (HR: 1.90, 1.23-2.95, p=0.004). In multivariable analysis, DM remained significantly associated with liver-related mortality (HR=1.79, 1.30-2.48, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DM is a frequent comorbidity in persons with ALD and is associated with a higher risk of liver-related mortality. Patients' diabetic status should be an important consideration for clinicians treating people with ALD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHepatology CommunicationsSame topicAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsFrench-language works237,207