MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412401004 · doi:10.31612/2616-4868.4.2025.04

INTEGRATION OF ASSESSMENT SCALES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CHRONIC MIGRAINE AND TENSION-TYPE HEADACHE

2025· article· en· W4412401004 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yuliia V. Bukreieva, O. I. Kalbus, O. V. Somilo, S. O. Makarov, Tetiana V. Yudina

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical and Preventive Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMigraineMedicineChronic MigrainePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. Chronic headache, including migraine and tension-type headache, affects a significant proportion of the population worldwide, posing a serious challenge to the healthcare system. Although diagnostic techniques are constantly improving, the definition of chronic primary headache remains a challenging task. Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of integrating specialized scales and questionnaires to improve the diagnosis and prognosis of chronic tension-type headache and chronic migraine. Materials and methods. The study included 61 individuals diagnosed with “Chronic Tension Headache” (CTH) or “Chronic Migraine” (CM) (according to the International Classification of Headache-3), and 18 individuals control group without chronic headache. All patients underwent a clinical and neurological examination and assessment using scales and questionnaires that determined the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of pain, concomitant symptoms, and quality of life of patients. To determine the discriminatory ability of the questionnaires used in the study for differentiating between CTH and CM, a correlation analysis and ROC curve were conducted. Results. The study revealed mainly strong direct correlations between the results of the McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), the headache severity questionnaire НIT-6, the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) in patients. A direct relationship was determined between the intensity of pain on the visual analogue scale and the HIT-6 score. The best operational characteristics (the highest sensitivity and specificity, AUC) were: the headache severity questionnaire HIT-6 (Se=96.67%; Sp=96.77%; AUC=0.990; p<0.01); MPQ: motivational-affective component (Se=100%; Sp=87.1%; AUC=0.990; p<0.01); visual analogue scale (Se=90%; Sp=96.77%; AUC=0.981; p<0.01); and the McGill pain questionnaire: sensory-discriminative component (Se=96.67%; Sp=100%; AUC=0.971; p<0.01). Conclusions. The HIT-6, Visual Analogue Scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire (motivational-affective and sensory-discriminative components) can be used as an additional tool for differentiating chronic tension-type headache from chronic migraine in patients. The prediction of the course of chronic migraine and chronic headache using questionnaires and scales depends on the severity of anxiety and depression, quality of life indicators and pain characteristics. Questionnaires and scales are relevant additional diagnostic methods in establishing the diagnosis of primary headache.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical and Preventive MedicineSame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207