MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412417116 · doi:10.1002/admt.202500635

Investigation of Exothermic Behaviors of Energetic Particles in Microfluidics Channels

2025· article· en· W4412417116 on OpenAlexafffund
Alex Baranovsky, Anqi Wang, A. Saleem, John Z. Wen, Carolyn L. Ren

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials Technologies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExothermic reactionMicrofluidicsNanotechnologyMaterials scienceChemical physicsChemical engineeringChemistryThermodynamicsPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Energetic composites are highly suitable thermal energy source for microelectromechanical systems devices, especially fluidics devices. This study investigates the delivery and energy release of Al@CuO core‐shell thermite microparticles in a microchannel filled with NaCl solution. Their transportation and ignition are achieved using electrical microfluidic transport and plasma generated by electrical discharging at various voltage conditions. The microchannel featured a converging–diverging geometry optimized for non‐intrusive electrical discharging at its throat and jet formation at its exit. Numerical simulation is carried out to model the spatial electrical potential distributions. Experimental results confirmed the microparticles are able to be transported and collected at the throat at low voltage while Joule heating induced bubble formation and subsequent electrical breakdown occurred at 120 V. At a higher voltage of 500 V, electrical discharging happened ubiquitously in solution, resulting in the ignition of energetic particles, resulting in a high momentum butterfly‐shaped jet. The temperature profiles, achieved through high‐speed infrared imaging, show the originally symmetrical temperature distribution surrounding the throat is extended to a broader zone with high temperatures at its center. Finally, the combustion of Al@CuO in microchannel is confirmed by 488 nm emission footprint, which agreed with the high‐temperature hot spots during the exothermic process. Microstructural analysis also demonstrates the existence of combustion products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Materials TechnologiesSame topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207