MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412418570 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2025.07.016

Outcomes with cesarean delivery vs vaginal birth in extremely preterm breech singletons

2025· article· en· W4412418570 on OpenAlexafffund
Yanchen Wang, Pasqualina Santaguida, Sameer Parpia, Fabiana Bacchini, Prakesh S. Shah, Kellie E. Murphy, Sandesh Shivananda, Sarah D. McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsB.C. Women's Hospital & Health CentreMount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoDiscovery Air (Canada)ImpactMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMedicineObstetricsVaginal birthSection (typography)Breech presentationGynecologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Decision-making regarding breech extremely preterm mode of birth is difficult. Seeming benefits with cesarean delivery in previous studies may have been due to other factors that had not been adequately accounted for. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of cesarean delivery vs vaginal birth with neonatal outcomes among live-born, extremely preterm, breech singletons who received active care at birth. STUDY DESIGN: This population-based cohort study included all live-born breech singletons between 23 and 27 weeks of gestation from 2010 to 2022, who received active resuscitation including those who died in the resuscitation room. We excluded outborn infants and those with major congenital anomalies. Our primary outcome was a composite of death, severe neurological complications, or birth trauma (mainly intracranial or other hemorrhage). The primary analysis comparing infants born by cesarean delivery vs vaginally used a generalized estimating equation Poisson regression model; sensitivity analyses included propensity score matching. RESULTS: From the 3332 extremely preterm breech singletons, 83.4% (2778/3332) were born by cesarean delivery. The adjusted incidence of mortality or severe morbidity was lower in the cesarean delivery group than in the vaginal birth group (26.1% vs 33.7%, respectively, adjusted relative risk of 0.77, 95% confidence interval, 0.63, 0.95, with adjustment for 14 factors including gestational age at birth). The reduction in mortality or severe morbidity following cesarean delivery persisted: after propensity score matching (adjusted relative risk, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.53, 0.89), and in those receiving optimized perinatal care (all of: antenatal corticosteroids, antenatal magnesium sulfate, and deferred cord clamping) or likely in those without optimized perinatal care, and in the subgroups of singletons born early (23-24 weeks) or likely later (25-27 weeks). CONCLUSION: Extremely preterm breech singleton birth by cesarean delivery was associated a reduction in mortality or severe morbidity. This association was robust and consistently observed in analyses addressing potential confounding through different methods and in clinical-relevant scenarios. Given that all 3 previous randomized controlled trials were stopped early due to recruitment challenges, this type of cohort data are the best available evidence for decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsFrench-language works237,207