MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412418870 · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2025.07.010

The effects of low-dose colchicine on the progression of aortic valve stenosis: Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Colchicine and Inflammation in Aortic Stenosis (CHIANTI) trial

2025· article· en· W4412418870 on OpenAlexaff
Niekbachsh Mohammadnia, Lucas T W Vestjens, Neil Craig, Jan G.P. Tijssen, Remco J.J. Knol, Sergiy V. Lazarenko, M. G. J. Duffels, Jeroen Jaspers Focks, Martin E W Hemels, Iris Oving, Hanke Schalkx, John W. Eikelboom, Aysun Cetinyurek‐Yavuz, Erik H.J.G. Aarntzen, Damini Dey, Piotr J. Slomka, Robin Nijveldt, Niels P. Riksen, Niels van Royen, Michael C. Honigberg, Marc R. Dweck, Jan H. Cornel, Saloua El Messaoudi

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Heart Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineColchicineStenosisCardiologyInternal medicineAortic valve stenosisInflammationAortic valveAortic valve replacementSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is one of the most common valvular heart diseases worldwide. Its prevalence increases with age and is expected to rise further as the population ages. Untreated severe AS carries a two-year mortality rate exceeding 50%. Furthermore, surveillance and management of AS impose a significant burden on healthcare systems. Therefore, effective pharmacological strategies are urgently needed to slow or halt the progression of AS. RATIONALE AND DESIGN Inflammation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of both atherosclerosis and AS. Anti-inflammatory therapy with low-dose colchicine reduces cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease, but its efficacy has not been tested in AS. Colchicine and Inflammation in Aortic Stenosis (CHIANTI) is an investigator-initiated, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial involving 150 patients with moderate AS. After confirming tolerance during a two-week run-in phase, eligible participants underwent coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography, 18 F-sodium fluoride ( 18 F-NaF) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, and echocardiography. Thereafter, participants were randomized 1:1 to colchicine 0.5 mg once daily or a matching placebo. All baseline imaging is repeated after 24 months. The primary endpoint is the change in aortic valve calcium score on CT. Secondary endpoints are (I) the change in aortic valve 18 F-NaF uptake on PET-CT and corrected for target-to-background ratio, and (II) the change in peak aortic jet velocity on echocardiography. CONCLUSION The CHIANTI trial evaluates whether anti-inflammatory therapy with low-dose colchicine can slow or halt the progression of moderate AS. If successful, it would offer the first effective pharmacological treatment for AS. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ), ID: NCT05162742.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Heart Journal→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→