MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412426225 · doi:10.1503/cjs.010224

Association between preoperative proton pump inhibitor use and postoperative infectious and renal complications following major elective surgery

2025· article· en· W4412426225 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Luc Dubois, J. Andrew McClure, Philip Mills Jones, Marko Mrkobrada, Suzanne Flier, Blayne Welk, Kelly Vogt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Use of poton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is associated with increased risk of Clostridioides difficile–associated colitis, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury. Their effect on postoperative complications is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between PPIs and the risk of C. difficile–associated colitis, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury following elective surgery. Methods: In this population-based, matched cohort study, we identified patients who had filled a PPI prescription within 90 days before major elective surgery (2010–2019). Study outcomes included C. difficile–associated colitis, pneumonia, acute kidney injury, gastrointestinal bleeding, and death within 90 days of surgery. We matched patients 1-to-1 on the basis of age, sex, procedure, date of surgery, and a propensity score predicting PPI exposure. We used logistic regression to evaluate between-group differences. Results: Of 313 163 patients, 89 047 (28.4%) used PPIs; of those, 79 681 were successfully matched to patients who did not use PPIs. The risk of the composite outcome (acute kidney injury, pneumonia, C. difficile–associated colitis, and death) among the patients who used PPIs was slightly higher than among the patients who did not use PPIs (10.6% v. 10.2 %), and was driven primarily by a higher rate of pneumonia among those who used PPIs (4.0% v. 3.7%). There was a lower rate of gastrointestinal bleeding among the patients who used PPIs (1.6% v. 1.8%). The risk of pneumonia was most pronounced in the subgroup undergoing hip and knee replacement (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.08–1.36; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to rates of C. difficile–associated colitis or acute kidney injury. Conclusion: We found that preoperative PPI use was associated with higher rates of pneumonia, particularly among patients undergoing hip and knee replacement surgery, and lower rates of gastrointestinal bleeding. Patients taking a PPI before surgery should be targeted for therapies aimed at reducing pneumonia risk, such as aggressive chest physiotherapy, following their operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of SurgerySame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207