Comparative Mitogenomic Analysis of Three Chionea Species (Tipulomorpha: Limoniidae): Insights into Phylogenetic Relationships and Selection Pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chionea is classified within the Tipuloidea superfamily and predominantly inhabits cold regions. However, its phylogenetic relationships remain contentious. In this study, the first three mitogenomes of Chionea (Diptera: Limoniidae) sampled in northeastern China (Jilin region) were sequenced, and their phylogenetic relationships were reconstructed by integrating these sequences with 30 additional Tipuloidea mitogenomes retrieved from NCBI. Unlike other Tipuloidea species, which are predominantly distributed in relatively warmer regions, this research investigates whether positive selection has acted on the mitogenomes of these three Chionea species due to environmental pressures, thereby elucidating key evolutionary drivers for Chionea. The three mitogenomes of Chionea exhibit characteristic features typical of insect mitogenomes, comprising 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 ribosomal RNA genes (16S rRNA and 12S rRNA), 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNA), and a single non-coding control region (D-loop). Notably, the secondary structure of trnS1 lacks the DHU arm in all three samples, and UUA (Leu) emerges as the most frequently utilized codon. Furthermore, the COX2 and ND5 genes utilize incomplete stop codons “T”. Utilizing these 13 PCGs, we reconstructed the internal phylogenetic relationships within Tipuloidea, revealing that Chionea tianhuashana and C. sphaerae form sister branches, while (C. tianhuashana + C. sphaerae) constitutes a sister branch to C. crassipes. Moreover, our analysis confirms the monophyly of Tipulidae, Tipula, and Nephrotoma as well as the polyphyly of Tipulinae, Chioneinae, and Limoniidae. In the branch site model analysis, three positively selected sites were detected when Chionea was designated as the foreground branches: COX3 (at position 242), ND5 (at position 535), and ND6 (at position 138).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".