LA FEMINIZACIÓN DE LA MIGRACIÓN INTERNACIONAL. Debates, implicaciones y retos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este capítulo propone, en el primer apartado, contextualizar la génesis de lo que se ha denominado feminización de las migraciones, con sus matices epistémicos, sin pretensiones de ser exhaustivos, pero con el espíritu de comprensión amplia de las implicaciones y desafíos de esta conceptualización. Al mismo tiempo, en el segundo apartado, se elaboran algunas posibilidades de relaciones conceptuales, tomando como base investigaciones en el área ya concluidas, que permiten abordar ejes temáticos que consideramos fundamentales. Estos ejes temáticos escogidos son: el lugar de la perspectiva de género para el estudio de las migraciones y, en este marco, el fenómeno de la invisibilización de las mujeres, las adecuaciones familiares, las posibilidades analíticas de la perspectiva interseccional y la incidencia de las políticas migratorias. Antes de las reflexiones finales, el tercer apartado, presenta un breve análisis que busca identificar algunas de las características de la producción científica asociada a este fenómeno.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".