MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412436416 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103355

Variability in trends of opioid-related hospital utilization among U.S. Adults, 2016–2021 check

2025· article· en· W4412436416 on OpenAlexaff
Lingxiao Chen, Zhuo Chen, J.-X. Ding, Roger Chou, Claire E. Ashton‐James, Baoyi Shi, Stephanie Mathieson, Maja R Radojčić, David Anderson, Ruiyuan Zheng, Runhan Fu, Yujie Chen, Lei Qi, Hengxing Zhou, Shiqing Feng, Manuela L. Ferreira

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersYoung Scientists FundNational Health and Medical Research CouncilManchester Biomedical Research CentreNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceShandong UniversityDepartment of Health and Social CareNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Institute for Social Care and Health Research
KeywordsMedicineOpioid overdoseOpioidHeroinOpioid use disorderFentanylPublic healthSubstance abuseEmergency departmentProxy (statistics)Socioeconomic statusEmergency medicineDrug overdosePoison controlDemographyInternal medicinePsychiatryEnvironmental healthDrugPopulation(+)-NaloxoneAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Understanding trends in opioid-related hospital utilization is crucial for informing public health policies; however, existing research is often limited in scope and methodology. This study provides national estimates from 2016 to 2021, emphasizing the variability in trends across different opioid categories and subpopulations. Methods: This study employed a repeated cross-sectional analysis using data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) and Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Analyses were performed in two periods: 2016-2019 and 2019-2021 (during the COVID-19 pandemic). Outcomes included rates of opioid-related diagnoses and three types of opioid use disorder-related clinical events: nonfatal opioid overdose, injection drug use-related acute infection, and substance abuse treatment. Further analyses were conducted by opioid category (e.g., heroin and synthetic opioids as a proxy for fentanyl), as well as subgroup analyses based on predefined demographic characteristics, including age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location. Findings: Between 2016 and 2019, in the NIS, there was a significant decrease in the rate of opioid-related diagnoses (relative change: -5.4%, 95% Cl: -9.4 to -1.3), nonfatal opioid overdose (-18.4%, -21.7 to -15.0), and substance abuse treatment (-25.1%, -45.9 to -4.3). Conversely, the rate of injection drug use-related acute infection increased significantly (14.4%, 7.3-21.4). In the NEDS, the rates of these outcomes did not change significantly. Notable variations were observed; for instance, in the NIS, the rate of nonfatal synthetic opioids as a proxy for fentanyl overdose increased by 21.1% (11.6-30.5), and heroin-related adverse event or poisoning increased by 51.8% (16.8-86.8) among adults aged 65-84. Between 2019 and 2021, in both the NIS and NEDS, the rate of nonfatal opioid overdose increased significantly (NIS: 8.1%, 3.5-12.7; NEDS: 24.8%, 11.5-38.0), in the NIS, a significant increase was found in the rate of injection drug use-related acute infection (relative increase: 8.2%, 1.2-15.1), while the rates of the other outcomes did not change significantly. Significant variations were also identified; for example, in the NIS, the rate of nonfatal opioid overdose did not show significant change among females, non-Hispanic whites, and adults with higher socioeconomic status. Interpretation: The significant variability in opioid-related hospital utilization trends among U.S. adults underscores the need for careful consideration in the design of future policies, especially during crises. Management strategies should be tailored to specific subpopulations, opioid categories, and OUD-related clinical events to maximize success rates. Funding: Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province-Pandeng Taishan Scholars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentFrench-language works237,207