Incidence, indications, and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Even though emergency peripartum hysterectomy is a lifesaving procedure for the various life threatening indications, its incidence is increasing resulting with various intra and post-operative maternal and perinatal complication. The incidence, indication and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy are the indicators of quality of maternal care and also vary in different African countries. Therefore this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the pooled incidence, indication and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Africa. Objective To assess the pooled incidence, indication and outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Africa. Methods A comprehensive search was done in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Hinari, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and Scopus between November 10 and 20, 2024 using searching terms. The quality of the included studies was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Random effect model were used to estimate the pooled incidence using Stata version 17. Higgins's I 2 statistics, subgroup analysis, and publication bias was done accordingly. Result This systematic review and meta-analysis included 25 studies with a total of 611,704 participants. The pooled incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy among delivered mothers in Africa was 2.12 per 1000 delivered women (95 % CI: 2.00–2.33), with a heterogeneity index of I 2 = 93.07 %, P = 0.00. A higher incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy was observed in West Africa (3.02 per 1000; 95 % CI: 2.47–3.58), and lower in South Africa (2.43 per 1000; 95 % CI: 0.54–4.32). The most common indications for emergency peripartum hysterectomy were uterine rupture (44.96 %; 95 % CI: 34.96–55.28), uterine atony (29 %; 95 % CI: 22.31–35.7), and placenta accreta spectrum (15.71 %; 95 % CI: 10.65–20.78). The most common outcomes of emergency peripartum hysterectomy were maternal mortality (8.19 %; 95 % CI: 6.81–9.57), perinatal mortality (50.59 %; 95 % CI: 38.9–62.28), maternal sepsis (18.87 %; 95 % CI: 16.61–21.21), maternal severe anemia (71.26 %; 95 % CI: 67.43–75.09), disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (8 %; 95 % CI: 3.59–14.01), and urinary tract injury (3.99 %; 95 % CI: 2.60–5.38). Conclusion The incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Africa was higher compared to developed countries. Uterine rupture, uterine atony and placental accreta spectrum were the most common indication for emergency peripartum hysterectomy respectively. The maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity was higher in Africa. This is due to poor quality of intrapartum, intraoperative and post-operative care in Africa. Therefore, capacity building in evidence based practice among the professionals to give the quality maternal care is needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".