MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412437164 · doi:10.1101/2025.07.14.25331527

Genetically Proxied Telomere Length but Not Epigenetic Aging Acceleration Causally Influences Healthspan: A Mendelian Randomization Study

2025· preprint· en· W4412437164 on OpenAlexaff
Bowen Feng, Robert Yang, G. Wang, Hu Qiu, Chuntao Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMendelian randomizationTelomereEpigeneticsGeneticsBiologyNon-Mendelian inheritanceMendelian inheritanceEvolutionary biologyDNAGeneMitochondrial DNAGenotypeGenetic variants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective To assess the causal effects of leukocyte telomere length (TL) and epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) on healthspan. Methods We performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses in accordance with STROBE-MR guidelines. Genetic instrumental variables (IVs) for TL and four EAA biomarkers (Hannum, GrimAge, PhenoAge, and intrinsic EAA) were derived from published genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics involving up to 472,174 individuals for TL and approximately 35,000 individuals for each EAA biomarker. GWAS summary statistics for healthspan, defined as age at first diagnosis of any of eight major chronic conditions or death, were obtained from the UK Biobank (N=300,477 unrelated European-ancestry participants). The primary MR estimates were obtained using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, complemented by various sensitivity analyses to assess pleiotropy, instrument heterogeneity, and robustness of causal inference. The strength of the IVs was evaluated using F-statistics, and causal directionality was validated using Steiger filtering. Results Genetically predicted longer TL was causally associated with extended healthspan (IVW β=0.106; 95% CI: 0.053–0.159; p=6.9×10 -5 ). The association was robust across multiple sensitivity analyses, with no indication of directional pleiotropy (MR-Egger intercept p=0.47), no influential outliers identified by MR-PRESSO, and consistent causal direction confirmed by Steiger tests. In contrast, none of the four EAA biomarkers demonstrated convincing causal effects on health span (all IVW p-values >0.05), and results were inconsistent across sensitivity analyses, suggesting their role as correlates rather than causal determinants of healthy longevity. Conclusions This MR study provides robust evidence supporting a causal role of genetically determined telomere length in extending healthspan, while no such effect was observed for four commonly studied EAA biomarkers. These findings underscore the central role of telomere biology in healthy aging and indicate that telomere maintenance may represent a promising target for interventions aimed at delaying the onset of age-related diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence→French-language works237,207→