MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412437652 · doi:10.1016/j.crbiot.2025.100314

Implementation of Dunaliella tertiolecta and Desmodesmus communis in a photobioreactor prototype for treatment of wastewater in a recirculating aquaculture system

2025· article· en· W4412437652 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Research in Biotechnology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAlgal biology and biofuel production
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBarrett FoundationWeston Family Foundation
KeywordsPhotobioreactorWastewaterAquacultureRecirculating aquaculture systemPulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceBiologyBiotechnologyEnvironmental engineeringFisheryEngineeringBiofuelFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inline photobioreactors (PBRs) are a promising tool for nutrient removal from aquacultural wastewater and production of valuable algal biomass, yet few PBR systems have been rigorously tested. Optimization of algal growth screening across species and strains of interest under specific water conditions is crucial but time-consuming, limiting PBR implementation. Here, we developed a high-throughput screening system to efficiently test algal growth under various nutrient treatments, with the goal of informing implementation in a PBR designed for wastewater treatment in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). We assessed growth of the marine alga Dunaliella tertiolecta and the freshwater alga Desmodesmus communis under a matrix of inorganic nitrogen (N) treatments in 96-well plates. We then tested ammonium transfer within a prototype PBR for RAS wastewater treatment and evaluated the batch growth response of D. tertiolecta to ammonium treatments in the PBR. Both species grew on the provided inorganic N sources, showing significant differences in response to N treatments due to species-driven variations in nitrogen uptake and storage mechanisms. D. tertiolecta thrived when grown individually on either nitrate or ammonium, while D. communis favored a combination of N sources. D. tertiolecta showed a 5.4% higher growth rate in nitrate than ammonium. Both species grew in nutrient-free controls, suggesting potential use of internal nutrient reserves. D. tertiolecta grew within the PBR, serving as proof-of-concept for algal cultivation in the prototype. This study supports PBR technology for enhancing food production systems and protecting food security through RAS wastewater treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it