MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412439978 · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2025.102123

Influence of pedestrianization on travel behavior changes: a case study of Montreal

2025· article· en· W4412439978 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hamed Naseri, Francesco Ciari, Cassiano Augusto Isler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transport & Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Pedestrianization promotes active modes of transportation and provides many benefits related to the environment, economy, health, and mobility. Nonetheless, it has often faced widespread opposition from residents and business owners. Therefore, it is essential to examine the effectiveness of pedestrianization programs (i.e., transforming streets into car-free zones). Objectives This study investigates the influence of different variables on pedestrianization effectiveness in Montreal, Canada. The effectiveness of pedestrianization is evaluated in terms of frequency and duration of walking trips, duration spent in street shops, and route change. Methods An online survey was distributed in Montreal. A powerful machine learning method (XGBoost) is used for modeling, and two interpretation techniques (SHapley Additive exPlanations and Partial Dependence Plots) are used to interpret the results of XGBoost. The performance of the developed interpretable machine learning approach is compared with Ordinal Logistic Regression. Results The top variables impacting the effectiveness of pedestrianization are the level of agreement in redoing pedestrianization projects every year, the opinion on the influence of pedestrianization on individual mobility, the level of satisfaction with urban furniture of pedestrian streets, the level of satisfaction with the attractiveness of pedestrian streets, and age. Conclusions Positive attitudes toward pedestrianization and active travel satisfaction are the top determining factors in supporting pedestrianization, and they play a vital role in the effectiveness of pedestrianization programs. Therefore, improving the urban furniture and the attractiveness of car-free streets increases the effectiveness of these projects. Among socio-demographics, age is the top variable, and pedestrianization is the most effective for individuals between 33 and 45 years. Accordingly, policymakers should prioritize the implementation of such projects in areas with the highest concentration of this age group to maximize their effectiveness. Further, travel behavior changes are highly dependent on the trip purpose and the built environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Transport & HealthSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207