Learning associations of COVID-19 hospitalizations with wastewater viral signals by Markov modulated models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent research highlights a strong correlation between COVID-19 hospitalizations and wastewater viral signals. Increases in wastewater viral signals may be early warnings of increases in hospital admissions. That indicates a promising opportunity to assess and predict the burden of infectious diseases and has driven the widespread adoption and development of wastewater monitoring tools by public health organizations. Previous studies utilize distributed lag models to explore associations of COVID-19 hospitalizations with lagged SARS-CoV-2 wastewater viral signals. However, the conventional distributed lag models assume the duration time of the lag to be fixed, which is not always plausible. This paper presents Markov-modulated models with distributed lasting time, treating the duration of the lag as a random variable defined by a hidden process. We evaluate exposure effects over the duration time and estimate the distribution of the lasting time using the wastewater data and COVID-19 hospitalization records from Ottawa, Canada during June 2020 to November 2022. The different COVID-19 pandemic waves are accommodated in the statistical learning. Moreover, two strategies for comparing the associations over different time intervals are exemplified using the Ottawa data. Of note, the proposed Markov modulated models, an extension of distributed lag models, are potentially applicable to many different problems where the lag time is not fixed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".