Larval morphology of the enigmatic genus Queda Sharp, 1882 supports monophyly of Hydrovatini (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of larval characters, including for the first time members of the rare and enigmatic genus Queda Sharp, 1882 was conducted to test the hypotheses of monophyly and relationships of the tribe Hydrovatini within the diving-beetle subfamily Hydroporinae. Our results indicate that Hydrovatini (including both Queda and Hydrovatus Motschulsky, 1853) is monophyletic and unambiguously supported by the absence of the primary pore PAo on the parietal and by the antennal process (commonly identified as A3’) arising from the base of the antennomere 4. This result agrees with the original concept of the tribe introduced more than 100 years ago but challenged by some authors. Our study supports the inclusion of Hydrovatini in a clade of ancestral hydroporine lineages together with Laccornini, Laccornellini and Pachydrini. Within this clade, Hydrovatini is sister to Pachydrini based on the shared absence of an occipital suture in instars II–III, although with weak support. The third-instar larva of Queda is diagnosed and described. It is characteristic in the broad and semicircular shape of the nasale, the maxillary cardo partially fused to the stipes, the presence of setiferous tubercles on the cephalic capsule and abdominal segment VIII, and the subcylindrical and relatively well-developed galea which, interestingly, is somewhat more developed than those exhibited by other hydroporines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it