MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412464610 · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2025.06.030

Development and External Validation of an Endoscopic and Histologic Pouchitis Assessment Tool: The Atlantic Pouchitis Index

2025· article· en· W4412464610 on OpenAlexaff
Rocío Sedaño, Christopher Ma, Malcolm Hogan, Mark S. Silverberg, Guangyong Zou, Geert D’Haens, Julie Rémillard, Lisa M. Shackelton, Stefanie C. McFarlane, Bozidar Bojić, Brian Bressler, Gregory Rosenfeld, Roger Feakins, Richard Kirsch, Aude Marchal, Mark Samaan, Remo Panaccione, Ailsa Hart, Bruce E. Sands, Iris Dotan, Simon Travis, Brian G. Feagan, Vipul Jairath

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CalgaryMount Sinai HospitalWestern University
FundersAmerican College of Gastroenterology
KeywordsPouchitisMedicineIntraclass correlationVedolizumabReceiver operating characteristicInternal medicinePlaceboGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND & AIMS: No fully validated indices to measure pouchitis activity exist. We aimed to develop and externally validate a novel endoscopic and histologic index. METHODS: Endoscopists and pathologists used 11 (4 endoscopic, 4 histologic, 3 composite) existing indices and items from a prior Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles appropriateness exercise to assess pouchitis disease activity in videos and images from 98 patients with chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis who participated in a randomized placebo-controlled alicaforsen trial. Reliability was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Responsiveness was quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). A novel index was developed using linear regression with a visual analog scale (VAS) of pouchitis endoscopic and histologic disease activity as the dependent variable and was externally validated with the EARNEST vedolizumab trial data. RESULTS: The Atlantic Pouchitis Index (API) (range, 0-69) comprises the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease and Robarts Histopathology Index. The API exhibited almost perfect intra-rater (ICC, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.92) and substantial inter-rater reliability (ICC, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.79). A high degree of responsiveness (AUROC, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98), greater than existing endoscopic indices (ΔAUROC, 0.09-0.24; P ≤ .005), was observed when the change criterion was a decrease in the VAS of one-half of the standard deviation. Good responsiveness was observed in external validation when vedolizumab was the change criterion (AUROC, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Development and validation of the API advances pouchitis disease assessment. Integration of endoscopy and histopathology results in an objective, reliable, and responsive instrument to evaluate therapy effectiveness in research and clinical settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.054
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.090
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0540.090
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Gastroenterology and HepatologySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207