MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412467526 · doi:10.1177/29768675251359700

Jugular Venous Doppler Ultrasound as a Non-Invasive Window to Right Heart Hemodynamics: A Narrative Review and Future Perspective

2025· review· en· W4412467526 on OpenAlexaff
Jon‐Émile S. Kenny, Philippe Rola, Ross Prager, Korbin Haycock

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Advances in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityHealth Sciences North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyJugular veinInternal medicineCentral venous pressureHemodynamicsHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) has produced great interest in venous Doppler ultrasound as a noninvasive means to evaluate right heart hemodynamics. While this score includes Doppler morphologies from sub-diaphragmatic veins, the physiology of transcutaneous venous Doppler velocimetry and its change with cardiac pathology was first studied and described in the internal jugular vein (IJV). Over 50 years ago, the systolic and diastolic velocity waves of the IJV were found to describe the x'- and y-descents of the jugular venous pulse (JVP) in sickness and in health. Therefore, it is established that abnormalities in right heart filling and function are reflected in the jugular venous flow velocity (JVFV) profile. In this narrative review, we highlight the physiology of the JVP, its relationship to right heart performance, and, accordingly, its connection with JVFV. Grounded upon decades-old, pioneering investigations, we briefly highlight JVFV in patients with post-cardiopulmonary bypass physiology, atrial fibrillation, pericardial tamponade, and pulmonary hypertension. We then describe a novel, wireless, and wearable Doppler ultrasound that continuously displays JVFV and consider how this device informs diagnosis and therapy of acute circulatory dysfunction. We touch on gaps in knowledge and suggest future avenues of inquiry with special attention paid to synchronous acquisition and interpretation of venous and arterial Doppler measures. We emphasize the clinical relevance of this technology and physiological framework, including acute, inpatient shock resuscitation, volume removal (eg, "de-resuscitation"), and the possibility for chronic, outpatient monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Advances in Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineSame topicHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyFrench-language works237,207