Acquired lymphangioma circumscriptum on the abdomen during pregnancy: A case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To our knowledge, acquired lymphangioma circumscriptum during pregnancy has only been reported on the vulva, and herein, we report a novel case of acquired lymphangioma circumscriptum during pregnancy on the abdomen. A 34-year-old woman presented with numerous papules draining clear fluid on her lower abdomen during the third trimester of her third pregnancy. She is healthy with no past medical history. Physical examination showed numerous clustered groups of hypopigmented flat-topped papules on the lower abdomen below the umbilicus. A punch biopsy showed epidermal acanthosis and hyperkeratosis and dilated lymphatic vessels in the superficial and upper dermis. Further imaging revealed no deeper lymphatic involvement and no underlying abdominal pathology. The favoured diagnosis was an acquired variant of lymphangioma circumscriptum on the abdomen, likely secondary to pregnancy. As the lesions were asymptomatic, no treatment was required. Dermatologists should recognize and differentiate this rare manifestation of acquired lymphangioma circumscriptum in pregnancy from other dermatoses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".