MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412471808 · doi:10.4102/sajce.v15i1.1704

Neurodiversity and trauma in early childhood: Implications for inclusive learning

2025· article· en· W4412471808 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hamid Patilima

Bibliographic record

VenueSouth African Journal of Childhood Education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyCurriculumThematic analysisPovertyPolitical sciencePedagogyPublic relationsMedical educationQualitative researchSociologyMedicineSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Neurodiverse children face significant challenges in early childhood education (ECE) – including sensory overload, social exclusion and rigid teaching methods, potentially causing trauma that hinders cognitive and emotional growth. High-income countries experience intense academic pressures, whereas low-resource settings grapple with insufficient support services and stigma, worsening educational disparities. Aim: This study explores intersections of neurodiversity and trauma in ECE, identifying barriers like inadequate teacher training, inflexible curricula and exclusionary disciplinary practices. It further investigates trauma-informed educational strategies and proposes policies for enhancing inclusion. Setting: Inclusive education policies in high-income countries (Finland and Canada) were compared to low-resource contexts (South Africa and Global South), highlighting disparities in resources, teacher preparedness and institutional support significantly affecting neurodiverse children’s educational experiences. Methods: A systematic qualitative secondary research design was employed, analysing reports from international organisations such as the (United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF], World Health Organization [WHO], United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [UNESCO] and International Labour Organization [ILO]) and peer-reviewed journal articles. Thematic content and comparative policy analyses identified challenges and best practices across socioeconomic contexts. Results: Neurodiverse learners disproportionately experience negative impacts from segregated classrooms and punitive discipline, leading to increased anxiety and reduced social interactions. Countries implementing inclusive strategies, such as universal design for learning (UDL) and individualised learning plans, report improved academic and social outcomes. Conversely, low-resource settings encounter substantial challenges because of limited resources and policy gaps. Conclusion: Addressing trauma in ECE requires structured routines, sensory-friendly classrooms and social-emotional learning (SEL). Integrating trauma-informed practices and expanding support services are critical. Contribution: The study advocates adopting UDL, trauma-informed education, improved teacher training and enhanced collaboration among schools, healthcare providers and families to bridge policy–practice gaps, establishing inclusive educational environments for neurodiverse children globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSouth African Journal of Childhood EducationSame topicEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207