MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412475867 · doi:10.18280/mmep.120610

Assessing Physical Fitness of Elementary School Students: A Case Study of SD Negeri 002 Lubuk Baja, Batam City

2025· article· en· W4412475867 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joni Eka Candra, Aulia Agung Dermawan, M. Ansyar Bora, Ansarullah Lawi, Ririt Dwiputri Permatasari, Abdul Mutalib Leman, Roland Roland

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study applies the Mamdani Fuzzy Logic method to assess the physical fitness levels of students at SD Negeri 002 Lubuk Baja, Batam.Physical education, which has been implemented since first grade, aims to improve students' physical fitness, playing an important role in enhancing learning effectiveness.However, many students are unaware of their fitness levels, which can affect their learning performance.The sample consisted of two students, one male and one female, who were tested with Sit-Up, Squat Jump, and Running exercises.The results were categorized as 'fit' based on their heart rate before and after physical activities.Validation of the results was conducted by comparing the Mamdani output with assessments from physical education teachers and experts.The validation metrics showed 100% accuracy in classifying the students' fitness levels, based on manual calculations and MATLAB simulations.For the male student, the output was 141 (MATLAB) and 140.9967 (manual), with the fitness decision being 'fit.'For the female student, the output was 122 (MATLAB) and 121.7945 (manual), with the fitness decision also being 'fit.'This study demonstrates that the Mamdani Fuzzy Logic method is effective for assessing students' physical fitness and provides accurate decisions that align with the students' actual fitness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Modelling and Engineering ProblemsSame topicSports and Physical Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207