MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412476251 · doi:10.1177/17479541251353666

Pre-season block periodisation: Hypertrophy and strength-power effects on youth Australian footballer jump profiles

2025· article· en· W4412476251 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew M. Jonson, Thomas P. Walden, Ashley Cripps, Ray Breed, Harry G. Banyard

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJumpBlock (permutation group theory)CardiologyMathematicsMedicinePhysicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to monitor changes in vertical jump force-velocity-power (FVP) profiles following hypertrophy (HYP) and combined maximal strength and power (CMSP) training in youth Australian Football athletes. This study implemented a single group, within-subject, non-randomised crossover design, prescribing sequential HYP and CMSP training to improve countermovement jump (CMJ) performance measured with FVP profiles. Twenty-one males (age: 17.2 ± 0.7 years; height: 183.8 ± 6.6 cm; body mass: 76.9 ± 6.2 kg) completed pre-testing, four-week HYP-mesocycle, midpoint-testing, four-week CMSP-mesocycle, and post-testing. The 8-weeks training comprised 2-sessions per week (16 sessions total). Pre-mid-post-testing involved unloaded (bodyweight) and loaded (50 kg) CMJ's on dual-force plates to create FVP profiles using Samozino's method to calculate raw (mean concentric force, velocity, and power) and theoretical (maximal force [F0], maximal velocity [V0], force-velocity relationship slope [Sfv], and maximal peak power [Pmax]) variables. One-way ANOVA assessed changes in all variables. Unloaded and loaded CMJ heights significantly increased after HYP and CMSP-mesocycles (post-testing, p ≤ 0.001), with only loaded CMJ height improving after HYP-training (mid-testing, p = 0.034). There was no change in raw variables after HYP training (mid-testing). However, mean concentric force, velocity, and power significantly increased in unloaded and loaded CMJs following HYP and CMSP-mesocycles (post-testing, p ≤ 0.001). Of the theoretical variables, only F0 significantly improved after HYP training (mid-testing, p = 0.023), yet after HYP and CMSP training, F0 and Pmax were significantly improved (post-testing, p < 0.001). Sequential HYP and CMSP block periodised training significantly improved unloaded and loaded CMJ height, all raw FVP variables, and theoretical F0 and Pmax in youth Australian Footballers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sports Science & CoachingSame topicSports Performance and TrainingFrench-language works237,207