MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412487404 · doi:10.1111/dom.16608

Prevalence of <scp>SGLT2</scp> inhibitor and <scp>GLP1</scp> receptor agonist prescriptions in type 2 diabetes patients with and without chronic kidney disease: Analysis of an Australian primary care dataset

2025· article· en· W4412487404 on OpenAlexaff
Hannah Wallace, James Wick, Brendon L. Neuen, Luke Buizen, Sunil V. Badve, John Chalmers, Juliana de Oliveira Costa, Michael O. Falster, Jeffrey T. Ha, Meg Jardine, Daniel Bekele Ketema, Jialing Lin, Craig Nelson, Sallie‐Anne Pearson, David Peiris, Anthony Rodgers, Takaya Sasaki, Mark Woodward, Martin Gallagher, Sradha Kotwal, Paul E. Ronksley, Min Jun

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Obesity and Metabolism · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneyEli Lilly AustraliaGeorge Institute for Global HealthUniversity of MelbourneBoehringer IngelheimAustralian GovernmentAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health CareUniversity of New South WalesIan Potter FoundationDavid and Elaine Potter FoundationEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsMedicineRenal functionKidney diseaseInternal medicineType 2 diabetesPopulationMedical prescriptionDiabetes mellitusCreatinineEndocrinologyUrologyGastroenterologyPharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims Sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP1‐RA) have cardio‐kidney‐metabolic benefit. This study aimed to understand the prevalence of prescription of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1‐RA among patients with T2DM with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Australian primary care. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective, cohort study of adults with T2DM who attended primary care practices participating in MedicineInsight. The outcome of interest was the percentage of patients with CKD who received ≥1 prescription for an SGLT2 inhibitor or a GLP1‐RA (assessed separately) compared to those without CKD during 2020–2021. We also assessed prescriptions in a sub‐population of CKD patients who met trial inclusion criteria: SGLT2 inhibitor (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥20 mL/min/1.73m 2 and urine albumin‐creatinine ratio [UACR] ≥22.6 mg/mmol) and GLP1‐RA (eGFR ≥50 to <75 mL/min/1.73m 2 and UACR >33.9 to <565 mg/mmol, or eGFR ≥25 to <50 mL/min/1.73m 2 and UACR >11.3 to <565 mg/mmol). Results Of 114 499 adults with T2DM, 36 840 (32.1%) also had CKD. SGLT2 inhibitors were prescribed in 13.6% of patients without CKD, 14.4% of patients with CKD and 17.8% of patients meeting the trial target population definition. Across these groups, GLP1‐RA were prescribed in 8.8%, 10.1% and 11.3% of patients, respectively. More advanced CKD stage and severely increased albuminuria were associated with a lower likelihood of SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP1‐RA being prescribed. Conclusion We observed low rates of SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP1‐RA prescriptions in patients with T2DM irrespective of CKD status. Strategies are needed to improve prescription rates, with a particular focus on patients with high kidney and cardiovascular risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Obesity and MetabolismSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207