MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412487686 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0327651

The role of contributing factors, triggers, and prodromal symptoms in the etiological classification of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; A scoping review

2025· review· en· W4412487686 on OpenAlexaff
Sedigheh Shaeri, Julie Considine, Katie N. Dainty, Theresa M. Olasveengen, Laurie J. Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreNorth York General HospitalUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationPublic Health Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEtiologyObservational studyPopulationMEDLINECochrane LibraryIntensive care medicineEmergency medicinePsychiatryInternal medicineMeta-analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Current Utstein etiological classifications for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are heterogenous and inaccurate when compared with robust sources. This heterogeneity may influence reporting incidence and outcomes and patient enrollment in observational studies and clinical trials. Circumstance-related factors may contribute to cardiac arrest; however, the role of these factors in improving the etiological classification of OHCA is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review was proposed to explore current evidence to identify the role of contributing factors, triggers, and prodromal symptoms of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the reported etiology of cardiac arrest based on emergency medical services data, medical records, or autopsy reports. METHOD: We searched Medline, Embase, and EMB review-Cochrane databases from 1946 to 2024. Studies were selected if the included population was adults with OHCA for whom the initial etiology was assigned, and any contributing factors, triggers, or prodromal symptoms of OHCA were reported. A descriptive review of the included studies was conducted. RESULT: The search yielded 24,833 citations. Seventy studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were published predominantly in Europe and Asia between 2010 and 2024 and classified as contributing factors (n = 24), exercise (n = 13), environmental triggers (n = 24), and prodromal symptoms (n = 9). The etiology of cardiac arrest initially assigned to cardiac or obvious non-cardiac classification may be precipitated by seizures (n = 8), trauma (n = 7), alcohol or drug intoxication (n = 6), Covid-19 infection (n = 5), myocardial infarction (n = 4), suicide (n = 4), antipsychotic medications (n = 4), and illicit drug use (n = 3). Exercise and environmental factors (e.g., particulate matter (PM) 2.5µ and ambient temperature) may trigger cardiac arrest predominantly due to cardiac etiologies. Based on EMS data, approximately 50% of patients with OHCA experienced symptoms prior to cardiac arrest which suggested cardiac and non-cardiac etiologies. CONCLUSION: Many circumstance-related factors may directly or indirectly contribute to cardiac arrest etiology classification. Listing these factors in the reporting template may help prehospital personnel and data abstractors gather enough information to identify more accurately the etiology of OHCA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.094
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.094
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.007
Bibliometrics0.0330.026
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→