Human infections with the raccoon roundworm, <i>Baylisascaris procyonis:</i> A scoping review.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: , is a gastrointestinal parasite with zoonotic implications. Objective: infections in humans. Procedure: OVID), Web of Science, and CAB Abstracts databases. Results: Sixty infections were identified. Most (38, 75%) were in males and the median age was 2.9 y (range: 9 mo to 73 y). Forty-seven (78%) individuals had neurological disease (9 with concurrent ocular disease), 11 had ocular disease alone, 1 had eosinophilic cardiac pseudotumor, and 1 was an incidental autopsy finding. Clinical signs of neurological disease were highly variable and progressive, with vague initial signs and symptoms. Ocular disease was most often manifested as diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis, retinal lesions, and painless loss of vision and visual acuity. Outcomes were reported for 42 individuals with neurological disease: 8 (19%) died, 4 (10%) fully recovered, and the remaining 30 (71%) had mild to significant neurological residual deficits. Most (7/10, 70%) individuals with solely ocular disease had permanent vision loss. Conclusion and clinical relevance: The severity of the disease, poor response to treatment, and widespread presence of the parasite in areas where raccoons are endemic indicate a need for awareness among the public, healthcare providers, and veterinarians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".