Artificial intelligence–driven oocyte assessment for predicting blastulation and high-quality blastocyst formation in severe male factor infertility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study whether artificial intelligence (AI)-driven oocyte evaluation is associated with blastocyst development and quality in couples with severe male factor infertility (SMF) undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. DESIGN: Cohort study. SUBJECTS: Fourteen thousand six hundred two oocyte images from 2,156 ICSI cycles performed between January 2020 and May 2024 in a private, university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center. Cycles were categorized into the following two groups: SMF (n = 200 cycles, 1,478 embryos) and non-SMF (n = 1,956 cycles, 13,124 embryos). Severe male factor infertility was defined as <5 million sperm in the ejaculate. EXPOSURE: Oocyte images were captured before ICSI and scored using the AI tool MAGENTA. The predictive value of Magenta Scores (MS) on embryonic development was assessed. The association between MS and oocyte fertilization and blastocyst formation was analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Oocyte fertilization, blastulation rate, and blastocyst quality. RESULTS: Magenta scores were significantly lower in oocytes that failed to fertilize compared with those that successfully fertilized (5.00 ± 0.04 vs. 6.44 ± 0.03). Blastulation rate was lower in the SMF group (46.61% vs. 50.80%), and blastocysts exhibited higher MS than nonblastocysts (5.12 ± 0.3 vs. 6.69 ± 0.3). The top-quality blastocyst rate was lower in SMF (56.6% vs. 65.2%), and high-quality blastocysts had higher MS than lower-quality ones (7.2 ± 0.6 vs. 6.8 ± 0.5). Among SMF cycles, MS were lower in oocytes that failed to fertilize (4.91 ± 0.12 vs. 6.34 ± 0.10). Magenta scores also differed between embryos that reached the blastocyst stage and those that did not (6.70 ± 0.11 vs. 4.96 ± 0.10). Top-quality blastocysts had significantly higher MS than others (7.00 ± 0.21 vs. 6.39 ± 0.19). Paternal age negatively correlated with fertilization, blastulation, and blastocyst quality; however, differences remained significant after adjusting for paternal age. CONCLUSION: Artificial intelligence-based oocyte evaluation is associated with fertilization, blastulation, and blastocyst quality in SMF couples undergoing ICSI cycles. Magenta score values were consistently higher for blastocysts than nonblastocysts, demonstrating the AI tool's utility in identifying oocytes with greater developmental potential, regardless of male infertility factors. However, the absence of sperm-specific factors in the MAGENTA algorithm may limit its ability to fully account for male infertility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".