MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412496268 · doi:10.1113/jp288700

Effects of nocturnal periodic breathing on sympathetic nerve activity and ventilatory control at high altitude: a randomised, crossover study

2025· article· en· W4412496268 on OpenAlexaff
Johanna Roche, James Fisher, Peter Rasmussen, Abubaker Ibrahim, Philip N. Ainslie, Rachel Turner, Giovanni Vinetti, Matteo Cesari, Michaël Furian, Ambra Stefani, Nikolaus C. Netzer, Hannes Gatterer, Birgit Högl, Christoph Siebenmann

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaInterior Health
FundersProvincia autonoma di Bolzano - Alto AdigeAustrian Science Fund
KeywordsVentilation (architecture)MedicineEffects of high altitude on humansAnesthesiaNocturnalHypoxia (environmental)Hypoxic ventilatory responseCrossover studyTidal volumePeriodic breathingPlaceboPeripheral chemoreceptorsRespiratory minute volumeInternal medicineCardiologyRespiratory systemChemoreceptorApneaChemistryAnatomyOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract During acute exposure to the hypoxia of high altitude, activation of the peripheral chemoreflex increases sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) and pulmonary ventilation. If exposure extends over several days, SNA and ventilation further increase and we investigated whether nocturnal periodic breathing (nPB) – a form of sleep‐disordered breathing that is common at high altitude – contributes to these further increases. In a randomised, placebo‐controlled, crossover protocol, twelve healthy men completed two 3‐day sojourns in hypobaric hypoxia equivalent to 4000 m altitude. nPB was inhibited by increasing inspiratory CO2 fraction during the nights of one (nPB−), but not the other sojourn (nPB+). Ventilation and plasma catecholamines were measured daily, while muscle SNA (MSNA) was assessed before and at the end of sojourns, without and with peripheral chemoreflex inhibition (transient hyperoxia). The hypoxia‐induced increases in MSNA burst frequency (nPB−, +104%; nPB+, +94%; P = 0.789) and incidence (nPB−, +47%; nPB+, +50%; P = 0.791) were not different between sojourns. Catecholamine concentrations throughout the sojourns were also similar (sojourn: P ≥ 0.271, time × sojourn: P ≥ 0.495). Ventilatory variables were not different between sojourns (sojourn: all P ≥ 0.090, time×sojourn: all P ≥ 0.062) except for a slightly greater tidal volume throughout nPB+ (sojourn: P = 0.047, time × sojourn: PP = 0.482). Chemoreflex inhibition induced similar reductions in ventilation during both sojourns (all P ≥ 0.151) and larger reductions in MSNA burst frequency (nPB−: −7.3 ± 2.7 bursts min−1, nPB+: −4.4 ± 5.1 bursts min−1, P = 0.037) and incidence after the nPB− (−0.9 ± 5.7 bursts (100 heart beats (HB))−1) than after the nPB+ sojourn (+2.4 ± 7.3 bursts (100 HB)−1, P = 0.046). We thus conclude that nPB does not contribute to the sympathoexcitation and hyperventilation associated with 3 days of exposure to high altitude. image Key points Prolonged exposure to high altitude leads to progressive increases in sympathetic nerve activity and pulmonary ventilation. Nocturnal periodic breathing (nPB), a form of sleep‐disordered breathing that is common at high altitude, may contribute to these progressive increases in sympathetic nerve activity and ventilation. In this randomised, placebo‐controlled, crossover study, twelve healthy men completed two 3‐day sojourns in hypobaric hypoxia where nPB was either inhibited or not. The hypoxia‐induced increases in sympathetic nerve activity and ventilation were not different between the two sojourns. We conclude that nPB does not contribute to the sympathoexcitation and hyperventilation associated with 3 days of exposure to high altitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physiology→Same topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep→French-language works237,207→