MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412510816 · doi:10.1002/jeo2.70368

The role of arthroscopy in intra‐articular adipose tissue‐derived mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of early‐stage knee osteoarthritis: A bicentric retrospective comparative study

2025· article· en· W4412510816 on OpenAlex
Simone Giusti, Ezio Adriani, Kristian Samuelsson, Alice Laudisio, Alexandra Horváth, Biagio Zampogna, Rocco Papalia

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisArthroscopyMedicineAdipose tissueMesenchymal stem cellStage (stratigraphy)Orthopedic surgeryKnee JointSurgeryPathologyInternal medicineBiologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose To determine the difference in clinical scores and re‐intervention rates in patients receiving intra‐articular adipose‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells (AD‐MSCs) as a stand‐alone treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared to patients receiving the same treatment following arthroscopic debridement and lavage. Methods Internal records at two orthopaedic centres were reviewed, and all consecutive patients with Kellgren–Lawrence II–III knee OA who had received intra‐articular AD‐MSC during 2017–2018 were included. The patients were stratified into two cohorts depending on whether they also received debridement arthroscopy. Patients were evaluated with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores as well as re‐intervention rates with a last available follow‐up of 5 years after the intra‐articular AD‐MSC injection. Results A total of 135 patients were enroled, 66 (49%) patients were male and 69 (51%) were female. The mean age at the time of intervention was 66 (range: 43–81) years. About half of the cohort ( n = 68) received a diagnostic and therapeutic arthroscopy (intervention) procedure in the same setting, whereas the other half ( n = 67) received intra‐articular AD‐MSCs without an arthroscopic procedure (control). Totally, 94% reported improved VAS scores post‐operatively. Seventy‐two patients (53%) had good symptomatic control at 5 years after the intra‐articular AD‐MSCs injection (VAS score range 0–3). Within this group, 57% of the patients had also received arthroscopy as part of their treatment, whereas the remaining patients had only received the intra‐articular injection of AD‐MSCs. Overall, WOMAC (46 arthroscopy + AD‐MSC, 58 AD‐MSC, p < 0.0001) and functionality (34 arthroscopy + AD‐MSC, 43 AD‐MSC, p < 0.0001) scores were superior in the cohort who also received debridement arthroscopy at the 5‐year follow‐up. Conservative re‐intervention rates, such as hyaluronic acid injections, were comparable amongst the cohorts. Conclusion Overall, debridement arthroscopy with AD‐MSC is favoured over stand‐alone MSC in Kellgren–Lawrence I–III knee OA. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it