Pengaruh Pemberian Aroma Terapi Ginger Terhadap Penurunan Emesis Gravidarum Pada Ibu Hamil Trimester I di TPMB BD Hj Ririn Restati Ningrum, S.St., M.Ap Kecamatan Bululawang Kabupaten Malang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emesis gravidarum merupakan keluhan fisiologis yang umum terjadi pada kehamilan trimester pertama dan dapat berdampak negatif terhadap kesejahteraan fisik maupun psikologis ibu. Intervensi non-farmakologis seperti aromaterapi jahe telah banyak diteliti terkait efek antiemetiknya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh pemberian aromaterapi jahe terhadap penurunan intensitas emesis gravidarum pada ibu hamil trimester pertama. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pra-eksperimental dengan pendekatan one group pretest-posttest design. Sampel terdiri dari 20 ibu hamil yang dipilih secara purposive sampling berdasarkan kriteria inklusi tertentu. Intervensi dilakukan melalui inhalasi aromaterapi jahe selama satu minggu dengan frekuensi tiga kali per minggu. Hasil uji Wilcoxon menunjukkan nilai p sebesar 0,002 (p < 0,05), yang mengindikasikan adanya perbedaan signifikan intensitas emesis gravidarum sebelum dan sesudah intervensi. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa aromaterapi jahe efektif sebagai terapi pelengkap dalam mengurangi gejala mual dan muntah pada kehamilan trimester awal. Kajian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi dasar pengembangan intervensi komplementer di pelayanan kesehatan ibu dan anak.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".