Methyl Radical Addition Reactions to C═X Double Bonds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Radical additions to olefins and related π-systems are essential tools in the modern synthetic toolbox for forging C–C and C–X bonds. We report a systematic DFT study (ZORA-(U)OLYP/TZ2P) on methyl radical (H 3 C • ) additions to H 2 C═X substrates, where X is varied across elements from the tetrel (group 14: C, Si, Ge), pnictogen (group 15: N, P, As), and chalcogen (group 16: O, S, Se) groups. Our analysis reveals clear periodic trends: addition barriers at carbon decrease, and those at X increase from tetrels to chalcogens; reaction energies become less favorable across a period but more favorable down a group. Regioselectivity favors addition at X except for X = CH 2, NH, and O, where carbon attack dominates─consistent with experimental data. These trends arise from a balance of orbital interactions and Pauli repulsion, with the latter emerging as a key, yet underappreciated, factor governing radical reactivity and regioselectivity in π-systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".