MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412529056 · doi:10.1016/j.inat.2025.102101

Morphometric variation of the C1 posterior arch

2025· article· es· W4412529056 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicole M. Schneider, Timothy Lasswell, Martine McGregor, Parham Rasoulinejad, Stewart McLachlin

Bibliographic record

VenueInterdisciplinary Neurosurgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of WaterlooLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsMedicineArchVariation (astronomy)AnatomyArtificial intelligenceArchaeologyGeographyAstronomyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surgical stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint (C1-C2) is required in various conditions, including type II odontoid fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, congenital malformations, tumors, and infections. However, the unique morphology of the C1 vertebra presents challenges for implant fixation due to the proximity of critical neurovascular structures and limited bony surface. While dimensions related to lateral mass screw placement have been well studied, less is known about the morphometric variation of the C1 posterior arch for alternative fixation methods such as hooks and clamps. This study aimed to characterize posterior arch morphology using both anatomic measurements and statistical shape modeling (SSM). A retrospective review of cervical spine CT scans from patients aged 65 or older was conducted to evaluate 77 intact C1 vertebrae. Using 3D Slicer software, fiducial landmarks were placed on five sagittal slices (midline, ±8 mm, ±15 mm) to obtain measurements of posterior arch height, width, and slope. Anatomical symmetry was analyzed, and principal component analysis was used in SSM to assess 3D shape variation. The analysis revealed substantial variability in posterior arch morphology, with no clear correlation between height and width across sagittal slices. The average coronal slope was approximately 15°, but ranged widely from 2° to over 30°. Lateral symmetry in height, width, and slope was generally preserved. SSM showed the greatest variation occurred in the transverse plane, with larger sagittal cross-sections associated with increased posterior curvature. These findings underscore the wide anatomical variation in the size, shape, and curvature of the C1 posterior arch—critical considerations for implant design and surgical planning. This study is the first to quantify variation in coronal slope and provides important guidance for developing alternative fixation techniques. Hooks and clamps must be designed to accommodate the full spectrum of posterior arch anatomy to ensure safe and effective stabilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.418
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterdisciplinary NeurosurgerySame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207