Morphometric variation of the C1 posterior arch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surgical stabilization of the atlantoaxial joint (C1-C2) is required in various conditions, including type II odontoid fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, congenital malformations, tumors, and infections. However, the unique morphology of the C1 vertebra presents challenges for implant fixation due to the proximity of critical neurovascular structures and limited bony surface. While dimensions related to lateral mass screw placement have been well studied, less is known about the morphometric variation of the C1 posterior arch for alternative fixation methods such as hooks and clamps. This study aimed to characterize posterior arch morphology using both anatomic measurements and statistical shape modeling (SSM). A retrospective review of cervical spine CT scans from patients aged 65 or older was conducted to evaluate 77 intact C1 vertebrae. Using 3D Slicer software, fiducial landmarks were placed on five sagittal slices (midline, ±8 mm, ±15 mm) to obtain measurements of posterior arch height, width, and slope. Anatomical symmetry was analyzed, and principal component analysis was used in SSM to assess 3D shape variation. The analysis revealed substantial variability in posterior arch morphology, with no clear correlation between height and width across sagittal slices. The average coronal slope was approximately 15°, but ranged widely from 2° to over 30°. Lateral symmetry in height, width, and slope was generally preserved. SSM showed the greatest variation occurred in the transverse plane, with larger sagittal cross-sections associated with increased posterior curvature. These findings underscore the wide anatomical variation in the size, shape, and curvature of the C1 posterior arch—critical considerations for implant design and surgical planning. This study is the first to quantify variation in coronal slope and provides important guidance for developing alternative fixation techniques. Hooks and clamps must be designed to accommodate the full spectrum of posterior arch anatomy to ensure safe and effective stabilization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".