MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412536387 · doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3589203

Scene-Centric Vehicle Trajectory Prediction at Cooperative Intersection Using Decision-Aware Attention Graph Transformer

2025· article· en· W4412536387 on OpenAlexaff
Behzad Abdi, Zeynab Rokhi, Carlos Vidal, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntersection (aeronautics)Artificial intelligenceTrajectoryTransformerGraphMachine learningEngineeringTransport engineeringTheoretical computer scienceElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roadside sensors offer a fixed, unobstructed vantage point that can overcome line-of-sight limitations in autonomous driving environments by sharing critical perception data with nearby road agents. While this cooperative approach enhances situational awareness, it also introduces significant computational and communication overhead for autonomous vehicles (AVs). To address this challenge, we propose the Heterogeneous Decision-Aware Attention Graph Transformer (HDAAGT)—a non-autoregressive, encoder-only transformer architecture designed for real-time vehicle trajectory prediction. HDAAGT processes detection data from roadside infrastructure to forecast future vehicle trajectories and communicates these predictions to surrounding agents. By offloading intensive computations from AVs and minimizing transmission latency, our approach improves responsiveness and enables more efficient cooperative perception at intersections and other complex driving scenarios. HDAAGT integrates lane positioning, traffic light states, and vehicle kinematics, enabling a decision-aware graph attention mechanism that models agent-agent and agent-environment interactions. By leveraging a fisheye-based detection and tracking pipeline, our approach eliminates the need for multiple cameras and enables HDAAGT to generate reliable trajectory predictions across the full intersection. We validate our model on the Fisheye-MARC and SinD datasets, demonstrating the capability of HDAAGT in predicting vehicle motion in complex urban intersections with a 1.28 m final displacement error. Additionally, we introduce a new 31k-frame fisheye intersection dataset, the largest of its kind in object tracking, to advance research in intersection-based trajectory prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207