MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412548280 · doi:10.1002/pbc.31913

Caregiving for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Receiving Home‐Based Blinatumomab: Caregiver Experiences and Recommendations

2025· article· en· W4412548280 on OpenAlexaff
Sue Zupanec, Tessa Palmert, Elham Hashemi, Kyobin Hwang, Terry Armstrong, Lauren Guidry, Lindsay Jibb

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Blood & Cancer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlinatumomabMedicineThematic analysisContext (archaeology)Lymphoblastic LeukemiaNursingFamily medicineQualitative researchLeukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: It is expected that blinatumomab will be increasingly incorporated into the care of children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) based on improved survival for subsets of patients and a favorable safety profile. Most of the 28-day continuous infusion can be administered in outpatient or home settings. Limited studies have described low rates of complications at home when appropriate safety plans are in place. However, home administration shifts the burden of monitoring and care to caregivers. PROCEDURE: Caregivers of children with B-ALL within 1 month of completing a first cycle of blinatumomab at home were recruited from three tertiary care centers and participated in virtual, audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews, with translation services available as required. Interviews were transcribed, coded independently in duplicate, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Identified caregiving context-specific barriers and facilitators were coded deductively. RESULTS: Participating caregivers (n = 21) described a time-bound confidence response where initial infusion anxiety was gradually replaced with caregiving self-assurance. Growing confidence co-occurred with improved caregiver wellness and child quality of life, characterized by resuming more usual family activities amid therapy. Barriers and facilitators to successful home-based blinatumomab included caregiver knowledge and skills, access to hospital-based support, and particular aspects of a family's social and material environment, and these underpinned recommendations for future caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers can confidently manage home-based continuous infusion blinatumomab with anticipatory guidance and support, and with attention paid to context-related modifiers to care. Caregiver insights should be reflected in the principles that become the basis of future pediatric B-cell ALL clinical trials and care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Blood & CancerSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207