MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412562202 · doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107750

Deep geological repositories — A review of design concepts, near-field evolution, and their implications for nuclear waste containment

2025· review· en· W4412562202 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Radioactivity · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSystems Engineering Research Center
KeywordsContainment (computer programming)Radioactive wasteField (mathematics)Earth scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyWaste managementComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective nuclear waste disposal is crucial for strengthening public confidence in nuclear energy as a cornerstone of sustainable, large-scale, carbon-neutral energy generation. Deep geological repositories (DGRs) provide the most viable long-term solution, employing a multi-barrier isolation system that inhibits radionuclide release and migration through a combination of engineered and natural barriers. While extensive research has focused on radionuclide transport mechanisms and the influence of geochemical interactions within host rock formations, a comprehensive understanding of the near-field environment, its physicochemical evolution, and its implications for repository design and nuclear waste management decisions remains underexplored. This review critically examines DGR concepts, near-field components, and processes, with a particular focus on canister-bentonite interactions, corrosion evolution, bentonite self-sealing mechanisms, and hydrogen gas generation. A critical assessment of experimental, numerical, and full-scale studies, highlights the complexities of coupled thermal, hydraulic, mechanical, and chemical (THMC) processes that govern repository evolution. Key challenges include scaling laboratory findings to field-scale repository conditions, integrating microbial and radiation-driven interactions, and refining long-term predictive models for corrosion and radionuclide migration. Addressing these gaps is critical for advancing repository safety assessments, optimizing engineered barrier systems, and ensuring the long-term stability of nuclear waste disposal strategies. These insights are expected to contribute to the ongoing development of robust and globally implementable waste management solutions, reinforcing nuclear energy's role in climate change mitigation and the transition to a net-zero carbon economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it