The CPEB ortholog Orb2 regulates brain size through the TRIM-NHL RNA-binding protein, Brain tumor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Neurodevelopment requires precise translational control, the disruption of which is implicated in various neurological disorders, including developmental delays, intellectual disability, and microcephaly. We report a novel role for the Drosophila CPEB-family protein Orb2, a translational regulator, in controlling brain size in a dose dependent manner. Loss of orb2 results in larval brain hypotrophy, whereas orb2 overexpression causes brain overgrowth. We demonstrate that orb2 is required for neural stem cell development from embryonic stages through larval neurogenesis. Structure-function analysis reveals that Orb2 RNA-binding activity promotes brain growth, while its poly-Q and ZZ domains act to restrain overgrowth. Further genetic and biochemical evidence indicates that orb2 functions upstream of the translational repressor Brain tumor (Brat), modulating Brat protein levels and, consequently, influencing brain size. These findings support a model wherein the antagonistic activities of Orb2 and Brat are critical for balanced brain growth during Drosophila neurodevelopment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".