MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412569914 · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag071

Cortical Functional Connectivity in Mouse Models of Early Blindness: Enucleation vs. Anophthalmia

2025· preprint· en· W4412569914 on OpenAlexafffund
Guillaume Laliberté, Denis Boire

Bibliographic record

VenueCerebral Cortex · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnophthalmiaEnucleationBlindnessCortical blindnessNeuroscienceFunctional connectivityMedicineOphthalmologyBiologyOptometrySurgeryGeneticsMicrophthalmia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early sensory deprivation drives large-scale reconfiguration of cortical networks, yet we still lack a clear understanding of the relative contributions of early visual experience and spontaneous prenatal retinal waves on the establishment of cortical networks. We compared two mouse models of early blindness, neonatal enucleation and congenital anophthalmia, across two genetic strains (C57Bl/6 J and ZRDBA) using mesoscopic calcium imaging of spontaneous activity and graph-theoretical analysis. Concomitantly, the functional network organization was redirected toward medial higher-order visual areas, the associative retrosplenial cortex, and somatosensory regions, while the primary and lateral visual cortices exhibited reduced influence and integration within the modular architecture. Notably, ZRDBA groups showed limited global changes to their cortical network. However, anophthalmic ZRDBA mice, lacking prenatal retinal waves, exhibited connectivity patterns more akin to enucleated C57Bl/6 J than to their enucleated littermates, suggesting a potential contribution of spontaneous prenatal retinal activity. These findings support a connectivity-constrained, experience-dependent model in which preexisting structural pathways guide diffuse, resilient reorganization following sensory loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCerebral CortexSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207