Assessment of Brain Morphological Abnormalities and Neurodevelopmental Risk Copy Number Variants in Individuals from the UK Biobank
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brain morphological abnormalities are common in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) and other neuropsychiatric disorders, often reflecting abnormal brain development and function. Genetic studies have found common genetic factors in NDDs and other neuropsychiatric disorders, although the etiology of brain structural changes in these disorders remains poorly understood. In this study, we analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and genetic data from more than 30K individuals from the UK Biobank to evaluate whether NDD-risk copy number variants (CNVs) are also associated with neuroanatomical changes in both patients and neurotypical individuals. We found that the size differences in brain regions such as corpus callosum and cerebellum were associated with the deletions of specific areas of the human genome, and that specific neuroanatomical changes confer a risk of neuropsychiatric disorders. Furthermore, we observed that gene sets located in these genomic regions were enriched for pathways crucial for brain development and for phenotypes commonly observed in patients with NDDs. These findings highlight the link between CNVs, brain structure abnormalities, and the shared pathophysiology of NDDs and other neuropsychiatric disorders, providing new insights into the underlying mechanisms of these disorders and the identification of potential biomarkers for better diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".