MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412571565 · doi:10.1093/petrology/egaf065

Decoding the Carbonatite and Clinopyroxenite Association at Hogenakkal, India: Insights into U–Pb Monazite Geochronology, <i>In situ</i> Trace Element, and Sr-C-O Isotope Geochemistry

2025· article· en· W4412571565 on OpenAlexaff
Sourav Bhattacharjee, Aniket Chakrabarty, Marco Brenna, Cheng Xu, Roger H. Mitchell, Е. Н. Козлов, Ekaterina Fomina, Mikhail Sidorov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petrology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonaziteGeochronologyCarbonatiteGeologyGeochemistryTrace elementRare-earth elementIsotope geochemistryIsotopeTRACE (psycholinguistics)Earth scienceRare earthZirconMantle (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Paleoproterozoic Hogenakkal complex (India) consists of carbonatites and clinopyroxenite emplaced within granulite country rocks. U–Pb monazite ages (~2.49 Ga) suggests that the carbonatites were emplaced in a post-collisional setting following arc magmatism and collision events between the Western Dharwar Craton and the Biligiri Rangan block (Southern Granulite Terrane). The carbonatites are of two distinct types: silicate-rich, xenolith-bearing early carbonatite-I, and silicate-poor late carbonatite-II. The absence of alkaline silicate rocks combined with the lack of compositional evolution and the presence of xenocrystal clinopyroxene, together with differing Sr isotopic signatures between clinopyroxenite (clinopyroxene: 0.70147 ± 0.00021; 2σ, n = 19) and carbonatite (apatite: 0.70175 ± 0.00015; 2σ, n = 17) suggests that these lithologies were not derived from a common carbonate-bearing alkaline silicate magma or represent an antiskarn. Additionally, the C–O isotopic signature (δ13C = −5.56 to −8.02‰; δ18O = 9.50–9.90‰) combined with the absence of dolomite and primary Fe–Mg silicates suggests that the carbonatites originated from mantle-derived calcitic magma, possibly by partial melting of a carbonated eclogite source. Subsequent to emplacement there was extensive phlogopitization of the pre-existing clinopyroxenite. Magmatic-to-carbohydrothermal evolution is governed by fractionation of magmatic calcite (Cal-1a) and apatite (Ap-1a), as well as interactions between the carbonatite and pre-existing clinopyroxenite and K-feldspar pegmatite. These processes collectively controlled the formation of lithology-specific REE mineralization. In carbonatite-I, the magmatic stage begins with the crystallization of LREE-rich calcite (Cal-1a) [(La/Yb)Cn: 18–36] and apatite (Ap-1a) [(La/Yb)Cn: 45–98]. The transition to the late-magmatic-to-carbohydrothermal stage involved the formation of phlogopite, actinolite, and allanite-(Ce), which co-precipitated with LREE-depleted Cal-1b [(La/Yb)Cn: 0.6–5.8] and Ap-1b [(La/Yb)Cn: 11–31]. Carbonatite-II has high REE and Sr enrichment, with REE-rich Ap-2 and Sr-REE mineralization, including celestine, monazite-(Ce), and hydroxylbastnäsite-(Ce). During the carbohydrothermal stage, LREE-depleted Cal-2 [(La/Yb)Cn: 1.6–6.1] crystallizes together with intergrowths of monazite-(Ce), celestine, and hydroxylbastnäsite-(Ce), and monazite-(Ce) rims on Ap-2. Externally derived hydrothermal fluids overprint the carbohydrothermal assemblage within carbonatite-I, clinopyroxenite, and K-feldspar pegmatites, forming Sr-LREE-poor Cal-3 [(La/Yb)Cn &amp;lt; 1], REE-Sr-bearing epidote, LREE-depleted Ap-3 [(La/Yb)Cn: 0.7–6.2], allanite-(Ce), and actinolite. Elevated δ18O (11.50‰), radiogenic Sr in calcite and some apatite (particularly Cal-3 and Ap-3), combined with prominent negative-Ce anomalies in Cal-3, indicate the involvement of low temperature, externally derived oxidizing hydrothermal fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PetrologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207