MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412573276 · doi:10.3390/genes16080849

Exploring Cloned Disease Resistance Gene Homologues and Resistance Gene Analogues in Brassica nigra, Sinapis arvensis, and Sinapis alba: Identification, Characterisation, Distribution, and Evolution

2025· article· en· W4412573276 on OpenAlexaff
Aria Dolatabadian, Junrey C. Amas, William J. W. Thomas, Mohammad Sayari, Hawlader Abdullah Al-Mamun, David Edwards, Jacqueline Batley

Bibliographic record

VenueGenes · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersAustralian Research CouncilGrain Research and Development Corporation
KeywordsBiologySinapisBrassicaGeneGeneticsChromosomePhylogenetic treeBotanyGenomeTriticeae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study identifies and classifies resistance gene analogues (RGAs) in the genomes of Brassica nigra, Sinapis arvensis and Sinapis alba using the RGAugury pipeline. RGAs were categorised into four main classes: receptor-like kinases (RLKs), receptor-like proteins (RLPs), nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) proteins and transmembrane-coiled-coil (TM-CC) genes. A total of 4499 candidate RGAs were detected, with species-specific proportions. RLKs were the most abundant across all genomes, followed by TM-CCs and RLPs. The sub-classification of RLKs and RLPs identified LRR-RLKs, LRR-RLPs, LysM-RLKs, and LysM-RLPs. Atypical NLRs were more frequent than typical ones in all species. Atypical NLRs were more frequent than typical ones in all species. We explored the relationship between chromosome size and RGA count using regression analysis. In B. nigra and S. arvensis, larger chromosomes generally harboured more RGAs, while S. alba displayed the opposite trend. Exceptions were observed in all species, where some larger chromosomes contained fewer RGAs in B. nigra and S. arvensis, or more RGAs in S. alba. The distribution and density of RGAs across chromosomes were examined. RGA distribution was skewed towards chromosomal ends, with patterns differing across RGA types. Sequence hierarchical pairwise similarity analysis revealed distinct gene clusters, suggesting evolutionary relationships. The study also identified homologous genes among RGAs and non-RGAs in each species, providing insights into disease resistance mechanisms. Finally, RLKs and RLPs were co-localised with reported disease resistance loci in Brassica, indicating significant associations. Phylogenetic analysis of cloned RGAs and QTL-mapped RLKs and RLPs identified distinct clusters, enhancing our understanding of their evolutionary trajectories. These findings provide a comprehensive view of RGA diversity and genomics in these Brassicaceae species, providing valuable insights for future research in plant disease resistance and crop improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.519

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenesSame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207