MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412579305 · doi:10.35975/apic.v29i4.2817

Integrating acute pain management protocols in obstetric intensive care: the effect on maternal morbidity in eclampsia and HELLP syndrome

2025· article· en· W4412579305 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fatima Bibi, Shama Chaudhry, Rehana Yasmeen, Hina Ramzan, Haseeb Khaliq

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia Pain & Intensive Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHELLP syndromeEclampsiaMedicineObstetricsIntensive carePregnancyIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background & objective: Eclampsia and HELLP syndrome are serious hypertensive diseases of pregnancy that are frequently admitted to the ICU. When it comes to seizure control and hypertension control, standardization of protocols in pain management is well established, although these are not commonly used; yet there is evidence that connects pain and adverse maternal outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis were used to assess the effectiveness of acute pain management protocols in reducing the maternal morbidity and other clinical outcomes in pregnant women admitted to the ICU for eclampsia or HELLP syndrome. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was pursued in [PubMed], Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for the studies produced till 2025. Inclusion criteria included RCTs, observational, and case report studies that focused on pain protocols in the obstetric ICUs. The key outcomes were maternal morbidity, ICU stay duration, and maternal-fetal survival. Assessment of risk of bias was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane RoB tool. A random effect model of meta-analysis was used. Results: 12 studies with 10, 153 patients were selected. Protocolized pain management, such as opioid- sparing and regional anesthesia, lowered the rate of maternal complications and stay in the ICU. The pooled OR for the better maternal outcomes was 1.23 (95% CI: 0.86–1.75), though not statistically significant. There was substantial heterogeneity (I² = 77%, p < 0.01), which was explained by protocol variation and disease severity variation. Conclusion: Incorporating the structured pain management protocols in the obstetric ICU care for eclampsia and HELLP syndrome can ameliorate the maternal outcomes, but the current evidence is heterogeneous. Regarding the necessity of RCTs, further multicenter RCTs are needed to standardize pain protocols in the high-risk population. Keywords: HELLP Syndrome; Anesthesia; Maternal Outcomes; Obstetric Complications; Meta-Analysis Citation: Bibi F, Chaudhry S, Riaz H, Gul E, Yasmeen R, Ramzan H, Khaliq H. Integrating acute pain protocols in obstetric intensive care: the effect on maternal morbidity in eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2025;29(4):326-33. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v29i4.2817 Received: May 09, 2024; Revised: October 26, 2024; Accepted: January 01, 2025

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.019
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnaesthesia Pain & Intensive CareSame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207