MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412587647 · doi:10.3390/clinpract15080136

A Mixed-Methods Case Report on Oral Health Changes and Patient Perceptions and Experiences Following Treatment at the One Smile Research Program: A 2-Year Follow-Up

2025· article· en· W4412587647 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mona Abdelrehim, ZhuZhen Huang, Christiana Martine, Kamini Kaura, Anuj Aggarwal, Sonica Singhal

Bibliographic record

VenueClinics and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Health and Care Utilization
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychosocialQualitative researchAnxietyNursingHealth careFamily medicinePatient satisfactionKindnessOral hygieneQualitative propertyPsychiatryDentistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In Canada, despite universal healthcare coverage, dental care remains predominantly privately financed, creating financial barriers that prevent many from accessing essential services. This case study is part of a larger initiative, the One Smile Research program, which evaluates the impact of cost-free dental care on the oral health and overall well-being of individuals who have been unable to access dental services in the past two years due to financial constraints. Participants in the program receive necessary dental care and attend follow-up appointments to assess the long-term effects of continuous cost-free care. Clinical Case: This mixed-methods case report focuses on a 26-year-old male participant and integrates a qualitative semi-structured interview with clinical and self-reported data, providing an in-depth understanding of his experiences. Results: Clinical outcomes demonstrated the effectiveness of the provided dental treatments, while self-reported measures indicated improved oral health, satisfaction with dental appearance, enhanced psychosocial well-being, increased self-esteem, reduced dental anxiety, and better oral hygiene habits. The qualitative interview identified three key themes reflecting positive experiences with the program: ease of admission, staff kindness, and overall well-being improvement. The integration of both quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed significant advancements in both objective and subjective measures, particularly regarding overall well-being. Conclusions: The continuity of cost-free dental care effectively addressed the participant’s oral health and overall well-being, with most benefits sustained even at the two-year follow-up. These individual-level outcomes offer preliminary insight into the potential advantages of universal dental coverage within the Canadian healthcare system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.215
GPT teacher head0.562
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinics and PracticeSame topicDental Health and Care UtilizationFrench-language works237,207