MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412587948 · doi:10.3390/plants14152263

High-Throughput DNA Extraction Using Robotic Automation (RoboCTAB) for Large-Scale Genotyping

2025· article· en· W4412587948 on OpenAlexafffund
Vincent-Thomas Boucher St-Amour, Vipin Tomar, François Belzile

Bibliographic record

VenuePlants · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersGenome Canada
KeywordsDNA extractionGenotypingComputer scienceScale (ratio)ScalabilityAutomationProcess engineeringBiologyDatabaseEngineeringPolymerase chain reactionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient and consistent DNA extraction is crucial for genotyping but often hindered by the limitations of traditional manual processes, which are labour-intensive, error-prone, and costly. We introduce a semi-automated, robotic-assisted DNA extraction (RoboCTAB) tailored for large-scale plant genotyping, leveraging advanced yet affordable liquid-handling robotic systems. The protocol/workflow integrates a CTAB extraction protocol specifically adapted for a robotic liquid-handling system, making it compatible with high-throughput genotyping techniques such as SNP genotyping and sequencing. Various plant parts (leaves, roots, manual seed chip) were explored as the source material for DNA extractions, with the aim of identifying the tissue best suited for collection on a large scale. Young roots (radicle) proved the easiest to harvest at scale, while the harvest of leaves and seed chips were more laborious and error-prone. DNA yield and quality from both leaves and roots (but not seed chips) were similar and sufficient for downstream analysis. Interestingly, root tissue could still be extracted from imbibed seeds, even if the seeds failed to germinate, thus proving useful for DNA extraction. Cost analysis indicates significant savings in labour costs, highlighting the approach's suitability for large-scale projects. Quality assessments demonstrate that the robotic process yields high-quality DNA, maintaining integrity for downstream applications. This semi-automated DNA extraction system represents a scalable, reliable solution for large-scale genotyping that is accessible to many users who cannot implement highly sophisticated and costly systems as are known to exist in large multinational seed companies. RoboCTAB, a low-cost, optimized method for high-throughput DNA extraction, minimizes the risk of cross-contamination. RoboCTAB is capable of processing up to four 96-well plates (384 samples) simultaneously in a single run, improving cost-efficiency and providing seamless integration with laboratory workflows, potentially setting new standards for efficiency and quality in DNA processing and sequencing at scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlantsSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207