Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueComputer Graphics Forum · 2025
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratorySchool of Medicine, Stanford UniversityStony Brook UniversitySorbonne UniversitéHelmholtz-Zentrum Potsdam - Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZUniversität StuttgartUniversität Duisburg-EssenNewcastle UniversityRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnSyddansk UniversitetLinköpings UniversitetUniversitetet i BergenZhejiang UniversityCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de ToulouseTianjin UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityUniversität ZürichUniversität RostockTechnische Universität MünchenTsinghua UniversityRenmin University of ChinaGottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität HannoverLinnéuniversitetetNorth Carolina State UniversityCarnegie Mellon UniversityAdvanced Micro DevicesKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchÉcole Centrale de LyonFudan UniversityUniversité Paris-SaclayUniversita degli Studi di Bari Aldo MoroUniversiteit UtrechtNanyang Technological UniversityUniversity of LeedsAugusta UniversityIndian Institute of Technology KanpurKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyYork UniversityTechnische Universität KaiserslauternTechnische Universität WienLeibniz-GemeinschaftSapienza Università di RomaUniversität WienEmory UniversityUniversity of OklahomaPurdue UniversityMedizinischen Hochschule HannoverUniversität PassauUniversity of Notre DameBrown University
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)Front (military)Geology
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexThis talk is a follow-on to my Eurovis 2009 Keynote titled ”Systems of Thought”. A system of thought is a set of concepts and representations that help us efficiently structure our thinking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
