MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412603914 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/addfda

Seasonal Changes in the Atmosphere of HD 80606 b Observed with JWST’s NIRSpec/G395H

2025· article· en· W4412603914 on OpenAlexafffund
James Sikora, Jason F. Rowe, Jared Splinter, Saugata Barat, Lisa Dang, Nicolas B. Cowan, Thomas Barclay, Knicole D. Colón, Jean-Michel Désert, Stephen R. Kane, J. Llama, Hinna Shivkumar, Keivan G. Stassun, Elisa V. Quintana

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityBishop's University
FundersEurostarsNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekEuropean CommissionNational Science FoundationGovernment of CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSpace Telescope Science Institute
KeywordsPhysicsAtmosphere (unit)AstrobiologyAstronomyAstrophysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High-eccentricity gas giant planets serve as unique laboratories for studying the thermal and chemical properties of H/He-dominated atmospheres. One of the most extreme cases is HD 80606 b—a hot Jupiter orbiting a Sun-like star with an eccentricity of 0.93—which experiences an increase in incident flux of nearly 3 orders of magnitude as the star–planet separation decreases from 0.88 au at apoastron to 0.03 au at periastron. We observed the planet’s periastron passage using JWST’s NIRSpec/G395H instrument (2.8–5.2 μ m) during a 21 hr window centered on the eclipse. We find that, as the planet passes through periastron, its emission spectrum transitions from a featureless blackbody to one in which CO, CH 4 , and H 2 O absorption features are visible. We detect CH 4 during postperiapse phases at 4.1–10.7 σ depending on the phase and on whether a flux offset is included to account for NRS1 detector systematics. Following periapse, H 2 O and CO are also detected at 4.2–5.5 σ and 3.7–4.4 σ , respectively. Furthermore, we rule out the presence of a strong temperature inversion near the IR photosphere based on the lack of obvious emission features throughout the observing window. General circulation models had predicted an inversion during periapse passage. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of studying hot Jupiter atmospheres using partial phase curves obtained with NIRSpec/G395H.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207