MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412608232 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2024-0241

Assessment of the status of western bean cutworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), a new major pest in field corn in Quebec (Canada)

2025· article· en· W4412608232 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Stéphanie Gervais, Frédéric McCune, Valérie Fournier, Julien Saguez

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalGrain Research Centre
FundersMitacs
KeywordsCutwormNoctuidaeLepidoptera genitaliaPEST analysisAgronomyBiologyField cornHorticultureEcologyZea mays

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The western bean cutworm (WBC), Striacosta albicosta (Smith, 1888) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is a corn ( Zea mays L., 1753) and dry edible beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) insect pest increasingly present in Canada, mainly in Ontario and more recently in Quebec, and causing an increasing number of cases of ear damage each year. The main objective of this study was to acquire knowledge (impact of biotic and abiotic factors) on WBC to eventually develop and implement integrated management of the pest in field corn. Over the summers and autumns of 2021–2022 (between mid-July and mid-October), we carried out moth tracking and egg mass scouting, analyzed the database of the Quebec pest monitoring network (Réseau d'avertissements phytosanitaires (RAP)) for the period 2010–2022, evaluated the impact of WBC on corn ears, and evaluated the effectiveness of different control methods, including the use of Bt corn hybrids producing the Vip3A protein and the use of insecticides, in several fields in different regions of Quebec. Our results demonstrate that among the ten agri-environmental factors studied, only the area cultivated with dry edible beans around the monitored corn fields, the region, and the soil texture influence the presence and abundance of WBC moths and the presence of egg masses in a field. In addition, WBC does not seem to affect ear growth (length and width), but the larvae favor the development of the corn ear rot. Finally, Bt Vip3A hybrids and insecticides appear to be effective methods to manage the WBC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.241
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207