MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412615207 · doi:10.15690/pf.v22i3.2903

Position Statement of the Joint Committee on Children’s Hearing on Hearing Loss Associated with Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection

2025· article· en· W4412615207 on OpenAlexaff
Г Ш Туфатулин, Sof’ya M. Vikhnina, A. V. Pashkov, Е С Гарбарук, V V Bakhshinyan, V. V. Dvoryanchikov, Г А Таварткиладзе, N.N. Volodin

Bibliographic record

VenueПедиатрическая фармакология · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition statementCytomegalovirusAudiologyStatement (logic)Hearing lossMedicinePosition (finance)VirologyHerpesviridaeLinguisticsVirusViral diseasePhilosophyFamily medicineBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV) can cause a wide range of diseases in newborns, it is most often associated with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). cCMV is the leading cause of non-hereditary SNHL (up to 25% of all SNHL cases in). SNHL can be congenital and can have late-onset (up to 50% of cases) up to school age, it determines the risk of its late diagnosis. Children with cCMV should be referred for diagnostic examination even after successfully passed newborn hearing screening. The child remains under the dynamic audiologist’s follow-up, if the diagnostic examination results are normal. Management of children with confirmed hearing loss includes early auditory prosthesis; in cases of severe hearing loss and ineffective auditory prosthesis — cochlear implantation, speech-language therapy, parents training and informing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.095

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0170.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueПедиатрическая фармакологияSame topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchFrench-language works237,207