MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412617287 · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1652208

Correction: The support of early-career researchers in health professions education—an expert position statement

2025· erratum· en· W4412617287 on OpenAlexaff
Doreen Herinek, Franziska Matthes, Mohamed Al‐Eraky, Elizabeth A. Anderson, Julie Browne, Maria Cassar, Ingrid Darmann-Finck, Götz Fabry, Marion Huber, Mirjam Körner, Sylvia Langlois, Kristina Mikkonen, Elise Paradis, Lisa Quinn, Ara Tekian, Daniëlle Verstegen, Robyn Woodward‐Kron, Michael Ewers

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Medicine · 2025
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatement (logic)Position statementPosition (finance)Health professionsMedical educationPsychologyMedicinePolitical scienceFamily medicineHealth careBusinessLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Please note that this is a correction. I have attached the correction sheet. I have not listed all authors again below, but only myself as the corresponding author, as specified by the system.All 19 authors are still on board.Only one person's affiliation needs to be corrected (see correction template).Thank you very much.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.190
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.190
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0120.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0730.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.498
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in MedicineSame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207