MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412618647 · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf057

Trajectories of behavioral and emotional problems in preschoolers with congenital heart disease

2025· article· en· W4412618647 on OpenAlexaffabout
Charles Lepage, Annie Bernier, Marie‐Noëlle Simard, Célia Matte‐Gagné, Anne Gallagher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Psychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeart diseaseDevelopmental psychologyPsychologyDiseaseMedicineClinical psychologyPediatricsCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To characterize intraindividual trajectories of behavioral and emotional problems in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) between 2 and 5 years of age, and to explore the predictors of these trajectories. METHODS: Sixty-six patients (42 boys) followed at the neurocardiac clinic of the Sainte-Justine University Hospital in Montréal, Québec, Canada were recruited. Their behavioral and emotional problems at 2, 3 ½, and 5 years of age were reported by parents. RESULTS: Correlations revealed moderate to high rank-order stability in child behavioral and emotional problems across time. Multilevel growth curves indicated significant fluctuations in intraindividual levels of these problems across time, which were not explained by child aging. Lower gestational age was associated with higher levels of anxious/depressed symptoms at age 2 years, which persisted through time. Severe forms of CHD were associated with a time-related decrease in three types of problems: attention, attention deficit and hyperactivity, and oppositional and defiant. CONCLUSIONS: Levels of parent-reported behavioral and emotional problems in children with CHD tend to persist from ages 2 to 5 years, suggesting the importance of early screening. However, unexplained intraindividual changes were also identified, highlighting the necessity to investigate other parental risk factors, for instance. Infants with a lower gestational age should be given special consideration since they continued to display more anxious/depressed symptoms up to school entry compared to children with CHD born at term. The decrease observed in some symptoms for children with severe CHD could result from altered parental perceptions or adverse effects of prolonged hospitalizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric PsychologySame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207