MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UC–Change: a classification-based time series change detection technique for improved forest disturbance mapping using multi-sensor imagery

2025· article· en· W4412626531 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ilia Parshakov, Derek R. Peddle, K. Staenz, Jinkai Zhang, Craig A. Coburn, Howard Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsAlberta Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryGovernment of AlbertaUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Resources CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Lethbridge
KeywordsChange detectionDisturbance (geology)Remote sensingComputer scienceSeries (stratigraphy)Artificial intelligenceEnvironmental sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionGeographyGeologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unsupervised Classification to Change (UC–Change) is a versatile technique that detects forest disturbances in satellite images by analyzing changes in the spatial distribution of spectral classes over time. This approach can fully utilize the spectral resolution of individual sensors without requiring atmospheric correction or radiometric normalization. Resulting multisensor capabilities set UC–Change apart from established time-series change detection methods, such as Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC), LandTrendr, Composite2Change (C2C), and Global Forest Change (GFC). With the growing number of Earth observation satellites, the ability to utilize diverse datasets is increasingly important for extracting information relevant to sustainable natural resource management. The algorithm’s effectiveness is demonstrated using a dataset containing 275 Landsat and Sentinel–2 images acquired over a forested area in British Columbia, Canada, from 1972 to 2020. The 100 km × 100 km study site has been actively harvested in recent decades and experienced many wildfires and a mountain pine beetle (MPB) outbreak. The spatio-temporal accuracy of clearcut and fire-scar detection was assessed using the Vegetation Resources Inventory (VRI) and National Burned Area Composite (NBAC) products, respectively, and compared against the C2C 1985 – 2020, CCDC 2002 – 2019, and GFC 2001 – 2022 maps available online. Overall, the UC–Change algorithm detected 85.2 % of the reference VRI 1974 – 2018 cutblock pixels at a temporal resolution of ± 1 year (90.3 % at ± 3 years). It detected 86.0 % of 1985 – 2018 VRI pixels, outperforming C2C (58.8 %). For the period 2002 – 2018, UC–Change mapped 87.1 % of the reference cutblock pixels, exceeding C2C (54.5 %), CCDC (74.0 %), and GFC (70.4 %). UC–Change, C2C, CCDC, and GFC detected 71.0 %, 54.6 %, 37.4 %, and 67.2 % of 2006 – 2018 reference forest fire pixels, respectively. UC–Change provided improved forest harvest and fire-scar detection in areas heavily affected by the MPB outbreak and forests characterized by low canopy cover. It represents a new, fundamentally different approach to time-series analysis, suitable for independent use or in concert with existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207