Entropy-Driven Structural Evolution in Ceramic Oxides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-entropy ceramics, with five or more elements randomly occupying the same cation crystallographic sites, offer vast compositional diversity and unique properties for material design and applications. However, for many dissimilar elements, entropic stabilization cannot overcome the enthalpic barrier to cation substitution. As a result, most high-entropy ceramics incorporate only a few similar elements, limiting the in-depth exploration of the effect of entropy on ceramic properties. Here, we first use density functional theory to model fluorite crystal structures composed of 1–10 elements and then experimentally present practical fluorite oxide nanostructures containing 1, 3, 8, and 15 metals, as well as a record-breaking 25-element high-entropy ceramic incorporating a diverse palette of rare-earth, transition, alkaline, p -block, and noble metals. As entropy increases, structural and configurational disorder in the solid solution rises, altering structural features such as lattice distortion, crystallinity, homogeneity, defect density, and thermal stability. This research provides new insights and understanding of the role of entropy in stabilizing compositionally complex ceramics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".