MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4412640460 · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1569435

Facing your fears in schools: using the ADIS/ASA to characterize anxiety and intervention outcomes in students with autism or suspected autism

2025· article· en· W4412640460 on OpenAlexaff
Judy Reaven, Kelly T. Cosgrove, Ainsley Losh, Sarah Nickles, Connor M. Kerns, Katherine Pickard, Audrey Blakeley‐Smith, Lisa Hayutin, Allison Meyer, Caitlin Middleton, Nuri Reyes, Richard E. Boles

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentHealth Resources and Services AdministrationU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsAutismAnxietyClinical psychologyIntervention (counseling)Psychological interventionPsychiatryRandomized controlled trialPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Autistic youth are at higher risk of developing anxiety compared to their peers, with as many as 40% experiencing clinical anxiety. Emerging research suggests that these rates are an underestimate as distinct presentations of anxiety (e.g., fear of change, idiosyncratic fears) are often not recognized. CBT is a well-established approach for managing anxiety in autistic youth, but many have difficulty accessing these interventions. School-based CBT programs, like Facing Your Fears in Schools (FYF-S), have shown effectiveness in reducing anxiety in autistic students and may increase access to care. The Anxiety and Related Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-5 with Autism Spectrum Addendum is a semi-structured interview that captures both DSM-5 and distinct presentations of anxiety. This study aimed to: 1) characterize a subsample of students with autism or suspected autism and anxiety and 2) examine effectiveness of FYF-S using the ADIS/ASA. Methods: =37; ages 7-14) from a larger Type 1 hybrid-effectiveness trial who had either autism or suspected autism. Students were randomized to either FYF-S or Usual Care (UC). Caregivers completed the ADIS/ASA at baseline and post-intervention. The ADIS/ASA was administered by clinicians rigorously trained to reliability and masked to condition. Results: Students had both DSM-5 and distinct anxiety diagnoses at Time 1. Further, students in FYF-S demonstrated significant reductions in anxiety compared to UC, as evidenced by fewer anxiety diagnoses overall and significant improvement in total anxiety. Conclusion: This is the first school-based study using the ADIS/ASA to characterize anxiety and measure outcomes in autistic students. Overall, results indicate that FYF-S may be a promising school-based intervention for autistic youth. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03685474, identifier NCT03685474.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Psychiatry→Same topicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research→French-language works237,207→